Javier Gardeazabal
;
Ainhoa Vega-Bayo
You're currently viewing an old version of this dataset. To see the current version, click here.

an empirical comparison between the synthetic control method and hsiao<i>et al.</i>'s panel data approach to program evaluation (replication data)

We compare two program evaluation methodologies: the synthetic control method and the panel data approach. We apply both methods to estimate the effect of the political and economic integration of Hong Kong. The results obtained differ depending on the methodology used. We then conduct a simulation that shows that the synthetic control method results in a post-treatment mean squared error, mean absolute percentage error, and mean error with a smaller interquartile range, whenever there is a good enough match.

Data and Resources

This dataset has no data

Suggested Citation

Gardeazabal, Javier; Vega-Bayo, Ainhoa (2017): An Empirical Comparison Between the Synthetic Control Method and HSIAO<i>et al.</i>'s Panel Data Approach to Program Evaluation (replication data). Version: 1. Journal of Applied Econometrics. Dataset. https://journaldata.zbw.eu/dataset/an-empirical-comparison-between-the-synthetic-control-method-and-hsiaoiet-alis-panel-data-approach-?activity_id=cdecfca7-0007-4487-9a75-47a2acfeb8c7