You're currently viewing an old version of this dataset. To see the current version, click here.

is deflation costly after all? the perils of erroneous historical classifications (replication data)

I estimate average economic activity during periods of inflation and deflation while accounting for measurement errors in 19th century prices. These measurement errors lead to underestimation (overestimation) of economic activity during periods of inflation (deflation). By exploiting multiple deflation indicators, it is possible to recover the true relationship; the shortfall of US industrial production growth during periods of deflation ranges from ?4.5 pp to ?7.6 pp, instead of ?2 pp. I also find a negative relationship between deflation and real activity in the UK. I then examine the cross-country variation in the estimates for eleven countries. The patterns are consistent with stronger biases for countries with more serious measurement errors in prices.

Data and Resources

This dataset has no data

Suggested Citation

Kaufmann, Daniel (2020): Is deflation costly after all? The perils of erroneous historical classifications (replication data). Version: 1. Journal of Applied Econometrics. Dataset. https://journaldata.zbw.eu/dataset/is-deflation-costly-after-all-the-perils-of-erroneous-historical-classifications?activity_id=499862e3-e0f0-42d0-a28a-d2ac1a66618f